Obama eligibility doubters finally get their day in open court; Obama boycotts Georgia hearing

Witness after witness presented testimony in a Georgia administrative court, collectively making the case that current White House resident Barack Hussein Obama should be disqualified from the 2012 ballot because he did not qualify for the Constitutional requirement that the President be a "natural born citizen."  Read the detailed description of the court proceedings by Jerome Corsi in WND, who headlined his piece that the collective claims of the plaintiffs was that Obama was "slam-dunk disqualified."

Barack Obama announced through his attorney that he will boycott administrative hearings scheduled for today in Georgia to review evidence of whether he legitimately is a candidate for the presidency, prompting an attorney for one set of the plaintiffs to describe the nation’s commander-in-chief as acting like a “5-year-old brat.”

A letter apparently from his lawyer, Michael Jablonski, was posted today on the website for California attorney Orly Taitz.  Jablonski told Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp in the letter that “serious problems” had developed in the hearings “pending before the Office of State Administration Hearings.” He said, “At issue in these hearings are challenges that allege that President Obama is not eligible to hold or run for re-election to his office, on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements.”

Jablonski said the judge – who previously rejected Obama’s demand to quash a subpoena for him to appear and bring with him his birth records documenting his status as a “natural-born citizen” – has “exercised no control” over the proceeding. “It threatens to degenerate into a pure forum for political posturing to the detriment of the reputation of the state and your office. Rather than bring this matter to a rapid conclusion, the ALJ has insisted on agreeing to a day of hearings, and on the full participation of the president in his capacity as a candidate,” Jablonski wrote.

In a response posted online, Kemp said the case referral was “in keeping with Georgia law.”

Read an earlier report in WND.